Identify and Scope
Resolve identity, tenant, role and permitted task boundary.
Sastra keeps identity, tenant boundaries, policy, privacy, approvals, audit evidence and operational override inside the execution path so authorised people can still constrain or correct AI-enabled work.
Policies matter most when they can still change what information is accessed, which tools are available, whether approval is required and what is allowed to happen next.
Establish the user or service identity before exposing context, models, tools or actions.
Use customer, workspace and user boundaries to control which records and memories may be assembled.
Decide what may be suggested, stored, routed, approved, executed or blocked.
Preserve requests, reasoning inputs, policy checks, approvals, actions and exceptions for review.
Enterprise AI risk is not solved by one switch. Several controls work together around identity, access, policy, approval, evidence and intervention.
Give users, groups, roles and service identities only the context, routes, tools and actions required for their responsibilities.
Separate data, memory, retrieval and execution according to customer and workspace ownership.
Control model choice, data handling, retention, tool access, execution rights and escalation requirements.
Keep sensitive, exceptional or irreversible actions subject to authorised review before execution.
Preserve who requested work, what evidence was used, which controls applied and what happened next.
Keep interruption, rollback and correction paths available to legitimate operators during execution.
Exact controls depend on the customer’s data classification, infrastructure, model policy and regulatory obligations.
Identify sensitive fields and keep unnecessary data out of selected reasoning or tool paths.
Replace sensitive values before selected processing and restore them only inside an authorised boundary when required.
Define which context may persist, for how long and under whose authority.
Apply Edge Guard patterns for sensitive-data handling, route restriction, audit capture and operational interruption.
Route work only to models and regions permitted by customer policy and deployment design.
Use encryption according to the selected platform and customer infrastructure controls.
The platform should make it possible to inspect and interrupt the path before consequences become irreversible.
Resolve identity, tenant, role and permitted task boundary.
Retrieve only authorised records, documents, memories and workflow state.
Permit only approved reasoning paths, endpoints, APIs and operations.
Escalate actions that exceed the system’s delegated authority.
Run the allowed action and preserve the operational history.
Use observability, audit evidence and override controls to investigate or change the trajectory.
Compliance depends on configured controls, operating procedures, evidence and clear customer responsibilities, not merely the presence of a feature label.
Test identity, permissions, tenant separation, retention, model policy and approvals for the implementation.
Business owners, security teams, compliance functions and authorised approvers retain accountability for consequential decisions.
Architecture, logs and control histories can support assurance and audit processes without implying automatic certification.
Governance becomes concrete when it is attached to identity, tools, deployment boundaries and a real workflow.
See the control plane around identity, policy, approvals, auditability and execution.
Compare cloud, private cloud, hybrid and customer-controlled deployment patterns.
Follow one guided scenario from identity and policy through approval, execution and audit evidence.